|
For further information contact: Svetlana Mintcheva at 212-807-6222
ext. 23
PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release December 2, 2002
FREE EXPRESSION AND ART ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS PROTEST THE CRIMINALIZATION
OF ARTISTIC EXPRESSION IN CINCINNATI
Today, a group of local and national free expression and art advocacy
organizations, the US Section of the International Association
of Art Critics, and a number of prominent artists and art critics
issued a statement protesting the criminal prosecution and sentencing
of photographer Thomas Condon for taking photographs in the Hamilton
County morgue.
The organizations and individuals signing the statement protest
the use of criminal law to intimidate and stifle creativity. "We
do not believe that photographing bodies is a criminal offense
to be punished with a two and a half year jail sentence," said
Svetlana Mintcheva, arts advocacy coordinator at the National
Coalition Against Censorship. She added, "This is the third time
since 1990 that criminal charges are leveled against artistic
expression in Cincinnati, which raises grave concerns about a
chilling effect on artistic freedom."
The group respects the feelings of relatives who believe their
rights to privacy have been invaded, but notes the fact that this
is not part of the criminal charges against Condon. Even if Condon
indirectly caused pain to the relatives that is not a criminal
offense. If privacy violations did occur, the remedy would be
an action in civil court for damages from the responsible party.
Thomas Condon has been out of jail since September pending appeal.
The appeal will be heard on December 5, 2002. If the appeal is
rejected, Condon will have to serve the remaining 2 years of his
sentence.
We protest the persistent criminalization of artistic expression
in Cincinnati and specifically the imprisonment of artist-photographer
Thomas Condon on criminal charges of corpse abuse for taking photographs
in a Cincinnati morgue.
Since 1990 Cincinnati has been the stage for repeated threats
against artistic freedom. The most prominent of these have involved
criminal prosecution. In 1990, Contemporary Arts Center Director
Dennis Barrie was indicted on criminal charges of obscenity for
hosting the controversial Mapplethorpe retrospective, The Perfect
Moment. Barrie was found not guilty. Four years later, the Pink
Pyramid, a gay bookstore, was charged with obscenity for offering
a video of Pier Paolo Pasolini's Salo: 120 Days of Sodom. A settlement
was successfully negotiated and the film is back on the shelves.
Now an artist is appealing a two and a half year criminal sentence,
of which he has already served five months in medium security
prison.
Death remains one of the major passages in life and artistic interest
in it dates back to ancient times. One of the earliest traditions
in photography was to photograph the dead as a way of memorializing
them. Nor is photography in the morgue such an exception - bodies
are photographed all the time for documentation and scientific
purposes, as well as with artistic intent. However, in Cincinnati
an artist has been sentenced as a criminal, on charges of corpse
abuse, for approaching the subject; a subject that, according
to the judge who sentenced him, is "sick" and "disgusting."
Murderers abuse corpses when they dismember or otherwise revile
the bodies of their victims. Thomas Condon is an artist working
on a project about life and death; he has harmed no one. The only
harm was done when some of the confiscated photographs appeared
in the media, understandably upsetting the relatives of the dead.
But it is the police, who had the photographs in their possession,
who should bear responsibility for making them public. Thomas
Condon did not publish any of the photographs; he didn't even
have the chance to produce final prints before his film was confiscated.
Even if Condon indirectly caused pain to the relatives of the
dead, that is not a criminal issue and belongs in the civil courts.
We welcome debate about the value of art, we respect the feelings
of those who believe their rights to privacy have been invaded,
and we agree they should be heard. We protest the use of criminal
law to intimidate and stifle creativity. Artistic expression,
even when it is controversial or offends some sensibilities, is
essential to our society and has the full protection of the First
Amendment. Art is not a crime.
National Coalition Against Censorship
Cincinnati Campaign Against Censorship in the Arts
Feminists for Free Expression
Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts
AICA - International Association of Art Critics (US Section) Martha
Wilson, Franklin Furnace founding director
Hans Haacke, artist
Nancy Spero, artist
Leon Golub, artist
Craig Lucas, playwright
Declan McCullagh, Photographer / Editor, Politech newswire
Katha Pollitt, writer and journalist
Milos Forman, filmmaker
Melissa Harris, Editor-in-Chief, Aperture
Donald Goddard, art critic
Eunice Lipton, art critic
Robert Atkins, art critic
Richard Kostelanetz, art critic
Peter Frank, art critic
Shifra M. Goldman, Art Historian
|