|
For further information, contact:
Judy Platt, Association of American Publishers, (202) 220-4551
Chris Finan, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression,
(212) 587-4025
Larry Siems, PEN American Center, (212) 334-1660, ext. 105
For Immediate Release
Washington, DC, August 19, 2002: Groups representing authors,
book publishers, and booksellers have criticized the Justice Department
for refusing to reveal publicly how many times it has used its
power under the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act to force bookstores, libraries
and newspapers to reveal confidential records, including the titles
of books an individual has purchased or borrowed. The House Judiciary
Committee had requested this information in June in an effort
to determine how the Justice Department is exercising the greatly
expanded investigatory powers it received under the PATRIOT Act.
However, in a letter to the Judiciary Committee dated July 26,
Assistant Attorney General Daniel J. Bryant said that the number
of bookstore and library subpoenas, and much of the other information
that the Committee had sought in its effort to exercise oversight
of the implementation of the PATRIOT Act, is confidential and
will be turned over only to the House Intelligence Committee (which
does not have oversight responsibility for the ACT). The contents
of the letter were reported by The New York Times on August 15.
PEN American Center, the Association
of American Publishers and the American
Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression expressed deep
concern over the Justice Department's decision. In a letter sent
today to House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner
and Rep. John Conyers, the Committee's Ranking Democrat, the book
groups said that Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act could have a chilling
effect on the First Amendment and urged the Committee to pursue
its efforts to ensure that the Justice Department does not abuse
its new power. "The secrecy surrounding the issuance of search
warrants pursuant to Section 215 and the lack of any adversarial
proceeding…are an open invitation to abuse of governmental power
in the absence of proper oversight," they said.
ABFFE President Chris Finan said he was deeply disturbed by the
Justice Department's refusal. "The PATRIOT Act has a potentially
chilling effect on the First Amendment rights of bookstore customers
because it gives the FBI the power to investigate what people
are reading," he said. "The refusal of the Justice Department
to tell us how many times it has used this power is even more
unsettling because it naturally leads to the suspicion that it
is using it a lot."
Larry Siems, director of the Freedom to Write Program at PEN
American Center, agreed, calling the refusal to turn over the
information "another disturbing episode in an ongoing struggle
to retain access to information on administration actions and
policies."
Judith Platt, who directs the Association of American Publishers'
Freedom to Read Program, stressed that "an individual's right
to read without the government looking over his shoulder is the
most basic right in a free society. If we allow this freedom to
be abridged in the interest of law enforcement, we have a right
to demand the most stringent standards of judicial and Congressional
oversight."
Founded in 1990 by the American Booksellers Association, ABFFE
is the bookseller's voice in the fight against censorship.
The Association of American Publishers is the national trade
organization of the U.S. book publishing industry. AAP's more
than 300 members include most of the major commercial publishers,
along with small and independent publishers and university presses.
AAP represents an industry whose very existence depends upon rights
guaranteed by the First Amendment. PEN American Center's mission
is to promote literature and protect free expression whenever
writers or their work are threatened. Internationally, PEN defends
writers from censorship, harassment, and imprisonment, as guaranteed
by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In
the United States, PEN defends the First Amendment and protects
free speech through sign-on letter campaigns, direct appeals to
policy makers, participation in lawsuits and intervention in legal
cases, awards for First Amendment defenders, and public events.
|