|
MEDIA ADVISORY - For
Immediate Release
CONTACT: Stephanie Elizondo Griest, Communications Director, Free
Expression Policy Project 212.807.6222 x 17
February 11, 2003
Protesting the relegation of millions of Americans to second-class
information citizenship, a coalition of non-profits and youth
media organizations submitted a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court
today arguing that the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA)
exacerbates the digital divide.
Under CIPA, libraries receiving certain federal funds or discounts
are required to install Internet filters. Even at their least
restrictive settings, these filters wrongly block tens of
thousands of valuable, non-pornographic Web pages, including
public health sites, political sites, and job search and career
sites. This puts people who depend on libraries for Internet
access - including lower-income citizens, the elderly, the
disabled, and residents of rural areas - at a discriminatory
disadvantage to people with computers at home, school, or work.
The brief argues that filters "undermine public libraries' core
functions as information providers and conduits for participation
in democratic life."
Signers of the brief include Partnership for Progress on the
Digital Divide, the Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network, Harlem
Live, Pacific News Service, Peacefire, Rock Out Censorship, TRUCE,
and Wiretap Magazine. The brief was prepared by Marjorie Heins,
the director of the Free Expression Policy Project (FEPP), a think
tank on artistic and intellectual freedom.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on the constitutionality of
CIPA on March 5, 2003.
To view the brief online, visit:
HTML:
http://www.fepproject.org/courtbriefs/cipabrief.html
PDF:
http://www.fepproject.org/courtbriefs/cipabrief.pdf
For more information about FEPP, visit:
http://www.fepproject.org. |